Bitcoin recent sideways price movement has reignited debate over whether quantum computing poses an imminent threat to the network. While some market participants point to technological fears as a reason for stalled momentum, many Bitcoin supporters argue the explanation lies elsewhere.
Analysts note that selling pressure from long-term holders has played a larger role than speculative concerns about future computing advances. According to on-chain data observers, Bitcoin experienced unusually heavy distribution from long-term investors during 2025 — a level of sell-side activity that would have severely impacted previous bull markets.
Glassnode lead analyst James Check said in an X post on Thursday;
Quantum computing, which relies on qubits instead of classical bits, has long been discussed as a potential challenge to existing cryptographic systems. Recently, renewed attention from traditional finance circles has amplified the narrative, with some investment strategists questioning Bitcoin’s long-term security assumptions.
However, several Bitcoin advocates remain unconvinced. They argue that quantum capabilities capable of threatening Bitcoin are still theoretical, and that current market behavior reflects standard cycles of profit-taking rather than existential risk.
Despite optimistic forecasts earlier in the year, Bitcoin ended 2025 down just over 6%, failing to meet aggressive price targets but still holding near historical highs. Supporters emphasize that price stagnation does not equal technological failure, and that preparation for future risks can occur without panic-driven market reactions.
As the debate continues, Bitcoin’s price remains stable, suggesting that investors are weighing fundamentals more heavily than speculative fears.
Disclaimer
This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or legal advice. Cryptocurrency trading involves risk and may result in financial loss.